Search Forums
Kiwitrees on Twitter

    spouse, logs, menus, individual resource, research tasks, Georgian, configure, latest version, users, Favourites, reports, source, tools, hover, release, ADDR, date, messaging, Batch Updates, Histo, add_asso_facts, census, webtrees, googlemaps, access roles, bug, custom modules, media, events of close relatives, 3.2.2, missing data, survey, re-order, .mo, ckeditor, zend, album, lists individuals families, server, order, special character, MYSQL, validation, title, shared note, inactive, upgrade, check, datatables, administration pages, simpl_pages, future, 5.6, edit, github, address, php 7, ID facts, 3.2.3, new feature


    1612 posts

    Sorry, but no, not unless a lot of other people come here and agree with you ๐Ÿ™‚

    I think the title is the least important of the fields there, so appropriately at the bottom. The most I would (almost) willingly change would be to move Title above Format and Type, as they do have reasonable default settings, so rarely need changing.

    I want users to think properly about all the other fields BEFORE they think about the title. I can understand it might be different for a single-user site, but some of us are trying to shepherd dozens of users, many with minimal IT skills. If they were encouraged to just add a title (because its the first thing they see) I’d spend all day moving media files to the correct sub-folder / setting the right TYPE etc… Those are all extremely important on complex sites.

    In the future (not this version of kiwitrees, its longer term replacement “kiwitrees-nova”) I may make the help texts less obvious (partially hidden) on narrow screens such as your image displays. That would help a bit, I’ assume.

    My personal kiwitrees site is